Following on from my own recent work in exposing local BNP councillor Simon Smith’s prurient views while posting under the alias ‘Steve Freedom’ on the Stormfront forums, I’m delighted to see that my esteemed collegue PoliticalHack has been doing a bit of digging of his own, and has managed to link the BNP’s temporary Birmingham City Councillor, Sharon Ebanks, to the Stormfront username ‘Odin’s Eye’ – for those of mythological frame of mind, ‘Sleipnir’s Arse’ would have been more appropriate for Sharon’s purposes.

Nice work, Hack!

Getting back to ‘Captain Freedom’ for the moment, Bob Piper also notes a report in the local press on Smith’s councillor.info website, which has been shut down due to it’s having violated the site’s Acceptable Use Policy – for the record, the reasons why (I guess) the site has been shut down are covered in this post of mine (no I wasn’t the complainant, BTW), which includes a screenshot of the material on Smith’s site that is, presumably, the cause of the complaint.

I must stress here that the real story in this matter is ‘Dumbass BNP Councillor can’t understand website AUP’, however a quick look at the BNP’s website shows them putting the usual prurient ‘spin on proceedings…

BNP criticism of Labour policy denied

The process of wiping out the British people appears to be accelerating. Ethnic minorities now make up nearly 19% of primary age pupils, according to latest figures from the Department for Education and Skills. Members of Parliament are overwhelmingly of a legal background and there is a disproportionate number of immigrants training to become lawyers. The letter here from Mrs. Sharma of Sandwell Council’s legal services department shows how our public bodies have been infiltrated by immigrants ready to use their newly won positions to punish the leaders and representatives of the indigenous community.

The letter suggests that just because Cllr. Smith, who was elected in May with 45% of the vote in the town’s Great Bridge ward, criticised Labour party policy, his means of publishing comment and criticism of Labour party policy has been denied to him. In essence Labour controlled Sandwell Council has denied a councillor elected on a BNP ticket the right and ability to criticise Labour policy. What on earth does the authority think our councillors are in chamber to do? Rubber stamp every Labour policy and amendment? Sit silently while the local authority flogs off the family jewels? Sit quiet while all manner of injustices are meted out to the indigenous population?

Real opposition

Far from it, our councillors are the only real opposition to Labour’s plans to enforce multiculturalism on an increasingly resistant indigenous population; our councillors are the only opposition to Labour’s plans to tolerate a fifth column of Islamics to strengthen their bridgeheads already in place in a score of towns and cities from Glasgow to Gloucester, Swansea to Sunderland; our councillors are the only representatives ready to expose the corruption, fraud and mismanagement prevalent within Labour run authorities. Conservatives and Lib Dems have had plenty of opportunity to counter Labour throughout the past few decades but have, in most cases, failed due to incompetence, acquiescence and collaboration with the mortal enemy of the British people. The new kids on the block suggest that any elected councillor worth his salt stands aside or gets behind the new radical force for change.

Gulag mentality

Readers are invited to examine the two page document posted to Cllr. Smith. Note the ominous mention of training on page 2:

“2) You undertake specific training in relation to local authority publicity and equalities.” (sic)

So now we have the scenario that councillors who object to the enforcement of the destruction of our island people and culture will be sent for “training”. Readers may need reminding that this is happening in Sandwell in the English West Midlands, not Maoist China or Leninist Soviet Union where the gulag was the final resting place of millions of dissidents.

Language skills

It is also clear that the writer of the document has difficulties with the English language:

For example, in addition to the above mention of local authority “equalities” (sic) we have the following

a. Website (no need for capitalisation of a noun – this is England not Germany!)
b. …..undermine the trust in the Council (the trust?)
c. …..used resources of the Authority not in it’s requirements (“it’s” should be the possessive “its”)
d. …..used resources of the Authority not in it’s requirements (we are lost for a suggestion!)

It is fully accepted that “dumbing down” of educational standards has been taking place for the past decade or so but senior personnel in public office should have an exemplary understanding of the English language, particularly in the realm of legal matters where just one word misplaced or the use of the wrong word could mean the difference between win or lose, acquittal or conviction.

Questionable authority
An unelected non-indigenous person has censored Simon, an indigenous Englishman, in HIS OWN country. As such Cllr. Smith questions the authority of Mrs. Sharma. Last year the British National Party voted to accept the constitutional articles of Magna Carta, The 1689 Bill of Rights and the 1701 Act Of Settlement as party policy:

The 1689 Bill of Rights states:

“And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God”

Act of Settlement:

“That after the said limitation shall take effect as aforesaid, no person born out of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, or Ireland, or the dominions thereunto belonging (although he be naturalized or made a denizen, except such as are born of English parents) shall be capable to be of the Privy Council, or a member of either House of Parliament, or to enjoy any office or place of trust, either civil or military, or to have any grant of lands, tenements or hereditaments from the Crown, to himself or to any other or others in trust for him;”

Appeal

Simon adds in his own words:

“I would appeal to all people reading this to realise your effort is essential. The “Establishment” is in the process of defrauding Sharon Ebanks of her lawfully won Birmingham seat. Kevin Hughes, another friend, has been imprisoned for being a member of the British National Party.

“The clock is ticking away. Do we deserve to carry on existing as a people?”

Challenge

Therein lies the challenge of our generation. Every single adult free born Briton can carry on drinking, smoking, gorging, spending and watching the flickering glass screen in the corner or pick up the glove and accept the responsibility and maturity to make sure our grand-children inherit their rightful place on this planet.
Which path will YOU take?

You can read the letter sent by Sandwell MBC’s legal services department to Simon Smith in full below:

This has, of course, fuck all to do with Magna Carta, the 1689 Bill of Rights and the 1701 Act of Settlement – the authority under which the site has been pulled derives from a Code of Practice on Local Authority publicity issued under powers granted under section 4 of the 1986 Local Government Act, while the duty to promote positive race relations derives from thr Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000.

Noticably, it seems that Smith if also off to the Standards Board – not the most auspicious start to his ‘career’ as a councillor.

Oops…